Over 59029
politifake

End Politics


THE SECOND AMENDMENT - Washington didn't use his right to free speech to defeat the British, he shot them.




END OF AN ERROR - Hang on, its coming soon


TAGS: end of an error
Rating: 4.58/5

More politifakes by JGalt



Gun Facts -




Obama's Promise to Bill Clinton -




The NRA -




GUN CONTROL - Isn't it ironic that an amendment put in place to protect us from unjust government is trying to be controlled by the government?




THE SECOND AMENDMENT -




IRS CONFUSION -




DEAR ANTI-GUN FOLKS: - Stand up for what you believe in and post this on your front door!


TAGS: gun control laws 2nd amendment
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

BiteMeNow - February 22, 2014, 11:55 pm
Never happen. Their a$$hole motto is "Do as I say, not as I do.


FREEEEEDOOOOMMMM!!!!! - This Independence Day message brought to you by William Wallace.




White Supremacist David Duke Endorses Trump -


TAGS: david duke endorses donald trump ku klux klan kkk white supremacist racism bigotry evilness
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - February 26, 2016, 2:22 am
I ran into this story today, http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/02/25/they-are-just-evil-glenn-beck-says-only-donald-trump-would-get-a-pass-on-this/


INDEPENDENCE DAY - Live it, love it, embrace it. FEEEEEEEEEL the power of democracy!




liberal children need dependency -




FIXING STUPID - We dont' have a revenue problem, but a spending problem. Remember that at the polls in November 2012.




great pretender -




Obama's Selective Outrage -




THE SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION - It is the ONE RIGHT that protects ALL OTHERS




RONALD REAGAN - Would protect and defend America


TAGS: ronald reagan would protect and defend america
Rating: 4.02/5

More politifakes by Jarhead

fauxnews - November 22, 2013, 6:22 pm
Hey, don't diss 'the man.' The last real conservative to grace American politics.
Realtalk - November 22, 2013, 6:04 pm
Due to fact he had alzhemier disease, he probably would forget where he put the army or misplace the marines.


OH, YOU'RE A FEMINIST? - Isn't that cute!




Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -




MR. O'S GOVERNMENT CHEESE - Use Liberally. Cut as directed.


TAGS: obama entitlements government dependency nannyism
Rating: 4.53/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

terroraustralis - September 21, 2014, 8:13 am
"denying government cheese is a great way to become a victim of police brutality. love the goverment cheese, OBEY. OBEY. OBEY." regardless of whether vote republican or democrat, in 2 years this might not be a joke.


FREEDOM - Bill of Rights that protects a right to keep and bear arms Is one of the most sanctified American freedoms




DEAR CONGRESS - that's a hint




Weeper Of The House -




Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -




OBAMAMATH - Obama increases spending 30% Obama spends 40% more than he takes in. Anyone not understanding the AA+ downgrade yet?




THE BUDGET OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT - explained in simple English




THE TASTIEST WAY TO MAKE A LIBERAL MAD - "I can't hear you complaining about LGBT rights over how awesome my chicken sandwich tastes."




FEDERAL RESERVE - Privately owned banking cartel that is destroying the US Dollar and making you poor. End it!




AHH, MY FRIEND -




"WHAT'S IN YOUR WALLET?" - Hand it over, because corporate jet taxes ain't gonna pay for my spending plans. I'm gonna need your home interest deduction, property tax deduction, medical and charitable deductions to pay for my plans




Obama The Elitist Hypocrite -




Liberal Moonbats -


TAGS: liberal moonbats progressives democrats gun grabbers nra second amendment 2a assault weapons hippies hillary clinton bernie sanders supporters
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - November 3, 2015, 11:52 am
The guy posted it as a joke to see who would bite. He got blasted from the Right, and even had lefties agreeing with and applauding him LMAO
tommygun - October 14, 2015, 9:43 pm
That's hilarious! Stupid people are so entertaining


THE FIRST AMENDMENT. - Giving Me The Freedom To Post This. Giving You The Freedom To STFU. God Bless America.




liberal transgender confusion -




Trump The Tyrant -


TAGS: donald trump tyrant bully first amendment freedom of speech press media hitler progressive tyranny despot authoritarian new york liberal democrat statist billionaire elitist totalitarian fascist autocrat
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - March 6, 2016, 3:20 am
Fortunately for him most of the defendants settled rather than going though the whole process. http://www.rcfp.org/browse-media-law-resources/news/georgias-highest-court-wont-review-jewell-libel-case
calron - March 6, 2016, 3:19 am
Richard Jewell had blatantly wrong information put out about him by the media and even though it was wrong, that wasn't enough because the law requires more than just being wrong for libel/slander.
Cyberhagen - March 5, 2016, 1:27 pm
The burden of proving the statement was factually incorrect would fall to the plaintiff.
Cyberhagen - March 5, 2016, 1:26 pm
Have to disagree with you here. The media has no "right" to publish lies (which is what libel is). Libel is not the same thing as simply making negative remarks about a public figure; as long as they are subjective, or demonstrably true, then no problem.


INFLUENZA VIRUS - It is deadlier than assault guns, why does not the Congress ban it?




CONSERVATIVE WOMEN - Exercising 2nd Amendment Rights at their monthly NRA Ladies Auxiliary meeting. (Women + Guns = Sexy)




GUN CONTROL -




For All You Birthers Out There -


TAGS: end birther arguments
Rating: 3.43/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

OTC - April 15, 2014, 12:51 am
The BC has "African" listed for the father because we all know 'black' or 'negro' were terms not used in the 1960's
Ron2 - April 14, 2014, 6:28 am
Because the government couldn't produce something as "legit" as a birth cert. Yeah, okay. I'd be even more ashamed of my government if they couldn't handle something so easy as forging a BC.


FRIEND ZONE -




SEE YOU IN COURT - 10TH AMENDMENT CHALLENGE TO OBAMACARE -




TEACH A MAN TO FISH -




THE LIBERAL AGENDA - Liberals being duped into the hidden agenda, time after time...




Obama's Gun Plan -




Hillary's Hellacious Hypocrisy -




A MESSAGE FROM THE QUEEN - No more 4th of July!! Them's fighting words!!




ABE LINCOLN QUOTE - Says it all




OBAMANOMICS, SIMPLIFIED - I'll gladly pay you Tuesday for another 1.5 Trillion dollars today!




ENTITLEMENT -




MR. PRESIDENT - are you going to cut spending?




GUNS - The government will only come and take away your guns after they've taken away everything else.




PREVENTION -




THAT'S OK - That means that the vikings and their descendants can stay!




CONFESSIONS OF A SPENDAHOLIC - Starring Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and George Bush




INVEST IN PRECIOUS METALS - Buy lead!


TAGS: 2nd amendment small arms 2012
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by thatmfguy

KALKAM - October 22, 2012, 5:01 pm
*now....talking like a filthy thief is not as easy as progressives make it look.
KALKAM - October 22, 2012, 5:00 pm
You have no right doing that...no give me your income.


WHEN MY GRANDFATHER WAS ALIVE -




HERMAN CAIN - The one Republican who publicly promotes that we have all the energy resources we need right here in America, and to hell with foreign energy dependence.




Man-made global warming fraud -




GREECE - A shining example of the outcome of debt-based government spending.




BALANCED BUDGET IN CALIFORNIA - Dems freeze out Republicans and borrow money to balance the budget and in the process call the borrowed money "revenue"! PRICELESS




why aren't liberals crying about seperation of church and state? -




Hildabeast Rotten Clinton's Reboot: Hillary 4.0! Or Is It 5.0, Or 6.0??? -




HOW TO EXPLAIN DOI TO TODAY'S YOUTH: - It's the pdf by which we got up in the grill of beeatch George, 'cuz he took our coin so he could have more bling.




GUN COLLECTION - My liberal friends ask me what am I afraid of? My answer is Not a damn thing.




GARY BUSEY - Endorses Newt Gingrich




GUESS - (Neither?)




PHYSICS -




SELF PRESERVATION -




COACH STIMULUS @ OSU - Oregon State Gets a $17.8Million stimulus package where baby bro works. Coincidence? Where does the swamp end?




NOT ONLY IS IT WORTH CELEBRATING, - it's also worth fighting for.




Big Banks & Derivatives -




spendaholics -




Liberal Science Deniers -




Remember Cyprus? -




Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -




HOW TO GET RE-ELECTED IF YOU ARE OBAMA - Buy your way there with taxpayer money!




Jon Stewart's Horrendous Hypocrisy -




Chris Kyle Day -


TAGS: chris kyle american sniper the legend texas seals military troops veterans iraq
Rating: 4.73/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

premiumgrade - February 5, 2015, 9:12 pm
5 big ones for you. Spoken like a man of considerable common sense. Thumbs Up
Bandit5906 - February 5, 2015, 5:20 pm
10L if it were possible


Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -


TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-global-temperature-conundrum-cooling-climate.html
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)


$2.1 B wasted on Obamacare enrollment system -




THE SPENDULUS CALCULATOR - The only calculator that can keep up with Obama's spending. Well, the first 2-3 years, that is....




government over spending -




DEMOCRATIC DEBT EXPLAINED - Self-explanatory




IF THE ROMANS HAD THE EPA - The Roman Empire might still be around




OBAMA ADMIN: THE WAR ON TERROR IS 'OVER' -




WARNING - pressure on my fourth amendment causes the rapid engagement of my second




SECOND AMENDMENT (VARIATION ON A THEME) -




AMERICA? - Where have you gone?




1/20/13 - Bubbye




MCRECOVERY MCJOBS - Epic Failure.




BACK-STABBER - Wikileaks disclosed that Obama's admin gave secret info on Britain's Trident missile program to get Russia's support for the New START treaty. Another ally under the bus.




DEFENDING OUR NATION - To keep the industrial war machine in business ...




If the media called a hispanic 'white'-hispanic -




free speach -


TAGS: offended
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by rerun

RonaldReagan - May 8, 2014, 3:00 pm
The actor who portrayed him expired. Both great men. Shame.


THE 2ND AMENDMENT - As gun control advocates see it.




the great pretenders -




By not speaking out against black on white crimes -




GOOD VS EVIL -




TREND? - Yes there is!


TAGS: trend
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by JGalt

JGalt - October 11, 2012, 11:07 pm
that's the sound of crickets in the background....


PREV PAGENEXT PAGE